Uncovering Hidden Relations. Exploring Social Rank Through 3D Models of Egyptian Tombs

Evgenia Filimonov (University of Haifa)
Shirly Ben-Dor Evian (University of Haifa)
Inna Kizhner (University of Haifa & Siberian Federal University)

Saturday, 7 October 2023 | 11:30 am – 12:00 pm

Abstract

The issue of social hierarchy has been the subject of frequent consideration and
examination in Egyptology discourse. Egyptian society was hierarchic from the onset of Pharaonic culture (Trigger et al. 1983; Candelora et al. 2022). Social status was conveyed in representations through a system of conventions regarding relative size, attributes of dress and hairstyle, and the sort of related activity and proximity to the ruler (Baines 1996; Frood 2010). Such attitudes were also extended towards non-Egyptians both within and beyond Egypt’s borders (Roth 2014). Similar hierarchies were also noted in private tombs
and studied through various case-studies (Kamrin 1999; Riggs 2013).

The proximity of people and animals to rulers in Egyptian iconography, as a measure of social rank and importance in Middle Kingdom tomb scenes at Beni Hasan, has been previously explored (Seidlmayer 2007, Frood 2010). Cohen (2015) noted that different social themes were related to different sides of the tomb decoration scheme. However, data-driven research – as done in Digital Humanities (see, for example Piper 2020) – has yet to be employed to measure the precise geometric distance between people and/or animals in tomb paintings, thus enabling a systematic validation or debacle of these observations.

Distances in a 3D space as a proxy of social hierarchy

Previously, 3D modelling for the spatial analysis of tomb structure in archaeology has been applied to understand the clan-family relationships in China (Yang et al. 2021) or to studytombs in Perugia that are difficult to reach through other methods (Radicioni et al. 2021). Archaeological studies also report on how 3D modeling is used to document tomb iconography for the purposes of conservation and subsequent analysis (Ceccarelli et al. 2021, Sykora et al. 2023). However, to the best of our knowledge, ours is the first attempt
to use 3D modeling of tomb iconography to study the representation of social hierarchy, rank or cultural relations, using quantitative approaches in a 3D space.

Our data sources are the depictions of the Middle Kingdom tombs at Beni Hasan from the publications that reproduce each wall in detail, observing the scale (Kanawati and Evans 2014, Mourad 2020, Kanawati and Barker 2022). They contain complete sets of line drawings, plans, and detailed architectural descriptions of the tombs, allowing us to gain a comprehensive understanding of the geometric arrangements for depicted people and animals to create 3D reconstructions, using the tomb’s dimensions.

This new methodological approach demonstrates the significance of distances and relative figure sizes. It also validates case-driven observations of sizes and geometric distances as a proxy for social rank in the Egyptian social hierarchy. Such rich data will provide valuable insights into the rank and relevance of each figure. For instance, we will be able to determine the importance of foreigners and their distance from Egyptian figures of higher social status, including the tomb owners.

We will build a grid for every wall and a general grid for wall development (one image of all walls from the entrance clockwise in one line). The approach will allow us to see if there is a pattern in the depictions in relation to the general grid. Geometrical measurements will be made to observe the relations and connections between different kinds of scenes and figures. A spatial grid will be built, following the construction of the linear grid. This will help us to test the hypothesis of the spatial relationship of the figures as a proxy for social distance in a 3D space.

It remains to be seen whether the results will be consistent or if there will be varying sizes and arrangements in different tombs. The quantitative data will enable us to analyze,compare, and draw conclusions. The importance of the ongoing research is that the obtained results will show not only the social relationships between Egyptians, but also cultural relations and the relations with the natural world that involve foreigners and animals. This methodology will reveal the social hierarchy between different cultures, as well as their level of contact and connectivity.

Literature

  • Baines 1996
    Baines, J., Contextualizing Egyptian representations of society and ethnicity, in: Cooper, J.S. – Schwartz, G.M. (ed.), The Study of the Ancient Near East in the Twenty-first Century: The William Foxwell Albright Centennial Conference (Indiana 1996) 339–384
  • Candelora et al. 2022
    Candelora, D. – Ben-Marzouk, N. – Cooney, K. M. (ed.), Ancient Egyptian Society: Challenging Assumptions, Exploring Approaches (London 2022)
  • Ceccarelli et al. 2021
    Ceccarelli, S. – Guarneri, M. – Romani, M. – Giacopini, L. – Francucci, M. – Ciaffi, M. – Fantoni, R., Are the blue daemons really blue? Multidisciplinary study for the colours characterization of the mural paintings inside the Blue Daemons Etruscan tomb, Journal of Cultural Heritage 47, 2021, 257–264
  • Cohen 2015
    Cohen, S., Interpretative uses and abuses of the Beni Hasan tomb painting, Journal of Near Eastern Studies 74:1, 2015, 19–38
  • Frood 2010
    Frood, E., Social structure and daily life: Pharaonic, in: Lloyd A.B. (ed.), A companion to ancient Egypt 1 (Oxford 2010) 469–490
  • Kamrin 1999
    Kamrin, J., The Cosmos of Khnumhotep II at Beni Hasan (London 1999)
  • Kanawati – Barker 2022
    Kanawati, N. – Barker, G., The Cemetery of Meir Volume 5: The Tomb of Wekhhotep III, The Australian Centre for Egyptology Reports 45 (Wallasey 2022)
  • Kanawati – Evans 2014
    Kanawati, N., – Evans, L, Beni Hassan Volume 1: The Tomb of Khnumhotep II, Australian Centre for Archaeology Reports 36 (Oxford 2014)
  • Kanawati – Evans 2016
    Kanawati, N., – Evans, L, Beni Hassan Volume 3: The tomb of Amenemhat, Australian Centre for Archaeology Reports 36 (Oxford 2016)
  • Kanawati – Evans 2019
    Kanawati, N., – Evans, L, Beni Hassan Volume 4: The tomb of Baqet III, Australian Centre for Archaeology Reports 42 (Oxford 2019)
  • Lashien – Mourad 2019
    Lashien, M. – Mourad, A.L., Beni Hassan Volume 5. The tomb of Khnumhotep I,
    Australian Centre for Archaeology Reports 43 (Oxford 2019)
  • Mourad 2020
    Mourad, A.L., Foreigners at Beni Hassan: Evidence from the Tomb of
    Khnumhotep I (No. 14), BASOR 384:1, 2020, 105–132
  • Piper 2020
    Piper, A., Can we be wrong? The Problem of Textual evidence in a Time of Data (Cambridge 2020)
  • Radicioni et al. 2021
    Radicioni, F. – Stoppini, A. – Tosi, G. – Marconi, L., Necropolis of Palazzone in Perugia: geomatic data integration for 3D modeling and geomorphology of underground sites, Transactions in GIS 25:5, 2021, 2553–2570
  • Riggs 2013
    Riggs, C., Mourning Women and Decorum in Ancient Egyptian Art, In: Frood, E. – McDonald, A. (ed.), Decorum and Experience: Essays in Ancient Culture for John Baines (Oxford 2013) 156–162
  • Roth 2014
    Roth, A.M., Representing the Other: Non-Egyptians in Pharaonic Iconography, in: Hartwig, M.K. (ed.), A Companion to Ancient Egyptian Art (Malden 2014) 155–174
  • Seidlmayer 2007
    Seidlmayer, S., People at Beni Hassan: contributions to a model of ancient Egyptian rural society, in: Hawass, Z.A. – Richerds, J. (ed.), The Archaeology and Art of Ancient Egypt. Essays in Honor of David B. O’Connor 2, Annales du Service des Antiquite’s de l’Egypte 36 (Cairo 2007) 351–368
  • Sykora et al. 2023
    Sykora, T. – de Lima, R. – De Meyer, M. – Vergauwen, M. – Willems, H., Puzzling Tombs: Virtual Reconstruction of the Middle Kingdom Elite Necropolis at Dayr al-Barsha (Middle Egypt), in: Lucarelli, R. – Roberson, J.A. – Visnon, S. (ed.), Ancient Egypt, New Technology. The Present and Future of Computer Visualization, Virtual Reality and Other Digital Humanities in Egyptology, Harvard Egyptological Studies 17 (Leiden – Boston 2023) 532–550
  • Trigger et al. 1983
    Trigger, B. – Kemp, B. – O’Connor, D. – Lloyd A. (ed.), Ancient Egypt: A Social History (Cambridge 1983)
  • Yang et al. 2021
    Yang, L. – Sheng, Y. – Pei, A. – Wu, Y., 3D spatial morphological analysis of
    mound tombs based on LiDAR data, Annals of GIS 27:3, 2021, 315–325


Cite this blog post
dabawa (2023, September 8). Uncovering Hidden Relations. Exploring Social Rank Through 3D Models of Egyptian Tombs. Digital Archaeology Bern - Ancient West Asia. Retrieved June 23, 2024, from https://dabawa.hypotheses.org/736

Search OpenEdition Search

You will be redirected to OpenEdition Search